Agile methodology compared to traditional project management. A comparison to analyze the advantages of both.
In a world where the way of working is changing, the methodology of organizing projects must also be revolutionized.
We will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the Agile methodology and that of the Waterfall or also called Traditional.
Project management has become
one of the most important pillars within any company, having been recognized as one of the fundamental factors for its proper functioning. This is why companies are looking for technologies, systems, and processes that help them customize and optimize project management.
This is how the Agile methodology was born .
However, there are still several doubts
about which is the best methodology to apply.
Technology, systems, the customer needs to grow exponentially and, in one way or another, we need to be able to adapt. Agile methodology seeks to bring that flexibility to the world of project management and completely breaks away from traditional frameworks.
The invention of the telephone by bahamas phone number library Alexander Graham Bell in 1876 set the stage for a revolution in communication. In the earliest days of the telephone, there were no phone numbers. Instead, phone operators manually connected calls by plugging wires into a
For example, when working on a consulting
project, there is no longer a set of Библиотека данных электронной почты pre-established steps; everything must be adapted to the individual needs of the specific client and modified if unforeseen events arise.
It’s the age of customization and flexibility.
Instead, there are structures and bh lists objectives, with predetermined timetables that one can never deviate from, under any circumstances and for any reason, which obviously cannot but favor the more traditional and static path.
Agile vs. Traditional: What Does Each Involve?
Before we compare these two methodologies, it is important to clarify what we mean by each.
Waterfall: Traditional Project Management
With traditional management we refer to systems based on the control of work according to well-defined protocols and where there tends not to be much room for last-minute changes or modifications. We can say that the characteristics of traditional management include:
Large work groups
Highly defined work methods
Strict deadlines
Well-defined roles
Little communication with the customer.
Agile Methodology
A much more open vision and capable of adapting to the needs of each individual project. The methodology is based on the optimization of time and human resources in order to produce the value and results agreed with the customer. Its characteristics are:
Multidisciplinary teams
Flexible management
Organization by EPIC or programmed over short periods of time
Periodic objectives
Short-term focus
Daily communications with the customer
Flexibility in the face of change
Differences between Agile methodology and traditional project management
As we have seen, the approaches start from very different concepts. Therefore, choosing one or the other will first of all imply a fundamental choice.
Agile focuses on adapting to changes and needs that emerge in the day-by-day of projects; this is why short-term planning is used. Working with a short-term view allows teams to add or eliminate tasks based on needs.
On the contrary, in traditional management,
where everything is much more “pre-established”, deviating from the schedule is more costly and the lack of flexibility is evident.
Furthermore, in a project that uses the Agile methodology, the customer plays a fundamental role as he is responsible for defining priorities and deadlines. The entire process is customized and adapted to his needs. Who knows exactly what the company needs is the customer himself. Not only that, the customer thus has full control of the project.
Even the teams involved in agile projects play a central role since each one is responsible for a series of tasks linked together according to specific objectives and timeframes; in essence, they are self-sufficient and self-managed, led by a project manager who organizes the work and interfaces with the customer.
Traditional hierarchies and protocols
– which often slow down processes – are thus forgotten.
Finally, the yardstick for evaluating the Agile methodology is customer satisfaction and the value that the team has brought to the customer.
Since these are two very different management approaches, can they coexist? Most experts argue that the best idea is to use them separately because if you use them in parallel, they can be totally counterproductive.
But then, how do you choose whether to use one or the other?
The point is that both options can be equally appropriate. It will depend on the project we have to manage
Top of Mind traffic, when the user has heard about the brand and wants to go to its site. Without feeling the need to ask Google for directions.
Direct traffic is therefore premium traffic because it reflects the level of independence of a brand with respect to third-party platforms ( primarily Google).
But in order to maintain a good level of direct traffic over time, the sites themselves must also transform
Traditional vs. Agile: Which to Choose?
It is therefore good to choose the methodology that best suits the project we have to work on even if, obviously, it would be better to say goodbye to closed and inflexible projects, to open up instead to flexibility and agility.
